At first, after "a quite unendurable winter", he revelled in the isolation and wild beauty of Jura. Barnhill, overlooking the sea at the top of a potholed track, was not large, with four small bedrooms above a spacious kitchen. Life was simple, even primitive. There was no electricity. Orwell used Calor gas to cook and to heat water.
Storm lanterns burned paraffin. In the evenings he also burned peat. He was still chain-smoking black shag tobacco in roll-up cigarettes: the fug in the house was cosy but not healthy. A battery radio was the only connection with the outside world. Orwell, a gentle, unworldly sort of man, arrived with just a camp bed, a table, a couple of chairs and a few pots and pans. It was a spartan existence but supplied the conditions under which he liked to work.
He is remembered here as a spectre in the mist, a gaunt figure in oilskins. The locals knew him by his real name of Eric Blair, a tall, cadaverous, sad-looking man worrying about how he would cope on his own. The solution, when he was joined by baby Richard and his nanny, was to recruit his highly competent sister, Avril. Richard Blair remembers that his father "could not have done it without Avril.
She was an excellent cook, and very practical. None of the accounts of my father's time on Jura recognise how essential she was. Once his new regime was settled, Orwell could finally make a start on the book. At the end of May he told his publisher, Fred Warburg: "I think I must have written nearly a third of the rough draft. I have not got as far as I had hoped to do by this time because I really have been in most wretched health this year ever since about January my chest as usual and can't quite shake it off.
Mindful of his publisher's impatience for the new novel, Orwell added: "Of course the rough draft is always a ghastly mess bearing little relation to the finished result, but all the same it is the main part of the job. After that, he said, he would need another six months to polish up the text for publication.
But then, disaster. Part of the pleasure of life on Jura was that he and his young son could enjoy the outdoor life together, go fishing, explore the island, and potter about in boats. In August, during a spell of lovely summer weather, Orwell, Avril, Richard and some friends, returning from a hike up the coast in a small motor boat, were nearly drowned in the infamous Corryvreckan whirlpool. Richard Blair remembers being "bloody cold" in the freezing water, and Orwell, whose constant coughing worried his friends, did his lungs no favours.
Within two months he was seriously ill. Typically, his account to David Astor of this narrow escape was laconic, even nonchalant. The long struggle with "The Last Man in Europe" continued.
In late October , oppressed with "wretched health", Orwell recognised that his novel was still "a most dreadful mess and about two-thirds of it will have to be retyped entirely".
He was working at a feverish pace. Visitors to Barnhill recall the sound of his typewriter pounding away upstairs in his bedroom. Then, in November, tended by the faithful Avril, he collapsed with "inflammation of the lungs" and told Koestler that he was "very ill in bed". Just before Christmas, in a letter to an Observer colleague, he broke the news he had always dreaded. Finally he had been diagnosed with TB. A few days later, writing to Astor from Hairmyres hospital, East Kilbride, Lanarkshire, he admitted: "I still feel deadly sick," and conceded that, when illness struck after the Corryvreckan whirlpool incident, "like a fool I decided not to go to a doctor - I wanted to get on with the book I was writing.
Astor arranged for a shipment to Hairmyres from the US. Richard Blair believes that his father was given excessive doses of the new wonder drug. The side effects were horrific throat ulcers, blisters in the mouth, hair loss, peeling skin and the disintegration of toe and fingernails but in March , after a three-month course, the TB symptoms had disappeared. The Soviet Union is history. Technology is liberating. But Orwell never intended his novel to be a prediction, only a warning.
A theatrical adaptation was rushed to Broadway. The vocabulary of Newspeak went viral. What does the novel mean for us? Not Room in the Ministry of Love, where Winston is interrogated and tortured until he loses everything he holds dear. Instead, we pass our days under the nonstop surveillance of a telescreen that we bought at the Apple Store, carry with us everywhere, and tell everything to, without any coercion by the state.
The Ministry of Truth is Facebook, Google, and cable news. We have met Big Brother and he is us. My local bookstore set up a totalitarian-themed table and placed the new books alongside They pointed back to the 20th century—if it happened in Germany, it could happen here—and warned readers how easily democracies collapse.
The crucial issue was not that Trump might abolish democracy but that Americans had put him in a position to try. Unfreedom today is voluntary. It comes from the bottom up. It combines hard nationalism—the diversion of frustration and cynicism into xenophobia and hatred—with soft distraction and confusion: a blend of Orwell and Huxley, cruelty and entertainment.
In the nineteen-seventies, it was used to comment on Nixon and Watergate. There was a bounce in readership in —four million copies were sold that year—because, well, it was And in it got a bump from Trump.
The fundamental premise of the novel was its most quickly outmoded feature—outmoded almost from the start. This is the idea that the world would divide into three totalitarian superstates that were rigidly hierarchical, in complete control of information and expression, and engaged in perpetual and unwinnable wars for world domination. This was a future that many people had contemplated in the nineteen-thirties, the time of the Great Depression and the rise of Stalinism and Fascism.
Capitalism and liberal democracy seemed moribund; centralized economies and authoritarian regimes looked like the only way modern mass societies could be governed. They wake you up, tell you when to exercise and give you news about the state. Still, there is only one channel, and it is entirely a state apparatus. In our time, so my Xfinity bill keeps telling me, we have hundreds of channels to choose from. But more so than propaganda, we live in a time of ads -- accumulating thousands of hours by the time one is 10 years old.
One of the creepier details in is that the screens can also watch the inhabitants. The social theorist Michel Foucault held that a central feature of modern society is the soft control of surveillance. It informs our sensibility, disciplining us without overt force and compelling us to adhere to normative behavior.
Now, with the National Security Agency perusing our phones hi! Still, the surveillance predominantly aims to capture us for a market. If you are reading this on a screen, then you are probably ignoring the ads in a sidebar. How did they know that you are a single something? Or a woman who wants running shoes? Or a man who might wear Brooks Brothers?
Indeed, Orwell is a hero of the right for being an anti-Communist, as well as of the liberal left. However, it is a mistake to see it as a confirmation of the politics of the United States. From the mids onward, Orwell was an avowed anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist.
If you read Animal Farm in junior high, his literary effort immediately preceding , you will recall that the story parodies the U.
But remember that the farmers expelled at the beginning of the book were capitalists who had grossly exploited and abused the animals. They are not the good guys, and the revolution is justified. The problem with the Communists is not Communism; it is that they become corrupted. During a brief moment after the takeover of the farm, things are good, led by a Lenin figure, with a fairer distribution of work and more plentiful food than under the capitalists.
In some ways, he was the Thomas Friedman of his day.
0コメント