Remember me Forget password? License Support Sign in Register. Fashion After Effects Templates. Follow us:. Here are eight occasions when you should avoid this popular frame rate.
Image via Warner Bros. Get stunning 4K film grain scans, shot on real film using high-end studio cameras. Get This Pack. Get all the details in our full review. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media. If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites. We looked at cameras with selfie-friendly screens, wide-angle lenses, microphone inputs and great video quality, and selected the best.
Submit a News Tip! Reading mode: Light Dark. Login Register. Best cameras and lenses. All forums Digital Video Talk Change forum. Started Mar 29, Questions. Mar 29, Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain. Use whatever you're comfortable with using -- hide signature Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain. Sean Nelson wrote: I'm going to place devil's advocate here and ask why record at 30p when you could record at 60p?
Markr's gear list: Markr's gear list. Makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the explanation. Markr wrote: Sean Nelson wrote: I'm going to place devil's advocate here and ask why record at 30p when you could record at 60p?
And the on Sony cameras is awful compared with on other cameras , I am still amazed by how good the footage from Sony HX20V was, especially for true run and gun: no hunting, no sudden jumps in exposure, no visual white balance shifts. Only when p Otherwise - nothing more dynamic than growing grass and resting cows chewing it. Zuiko Digital 45mm F1. Sean Nelson wrote: buratino wrote: Markr wrote: Sean Nelson wrote: I'm going to place devil's advocate here and ask why record at 30p when you could record at 60p?
Sean, I do not pretend I shoot anything of art or cine-like value, but I do like quality, so I need a reliable run and gun tool, even with not a big sensor. Finally, 30p plays better with my computer screens, tablets and smartphones. Atlasman's gear list: Atlasman's gear list. Few reasons 1. Slower to edit and render. New TVs have good motion enhancer which makes 30p look almost as smooth as 60p.
Stemu's gear list: Stemu's gear list. I my opinion, there is no benefit from recording 24p And thirdly, as noted above, there might be a slight crop. Some poeple might not want that. Some people might prefer that slightly flickering look over smoother 30p. Stemu wrote: "I my opinion, there is no benefit from recording 24p Atlasman wrote: I believe that image resolution is king. This is exactly why I prefer to shoot at 60p and why I chose a camera capable of 4Kp Thanks a lot for all the responses.
I learned quite a bit on here! If I record 24fps in MB it's 4. Do I have to worry about that? Not really I would assume Thanks! F Forum M My threads. Fast forward a few decades to the invention of the television and broadcast standards, including interlaced and the progressives, and different frame rates came into play. Meanwhile, cinema stayed faithful to the 24fps standard and audiences grew accustomed to it.
Even today, if you want to achieve a 'cinematic look' to your home movies, you would use this standard. There have been attempts in the past to move on, to evoke a similar passion for another standard or look, but so far things have been fruitless. I remember back in looking forward to Michael Mann's true story gangster movie Public Enemies. The motion seemed so lifelike, some of it was shot with the latest high definition cameras, and it looked set to blow my amateur movie-going mind.
What we got was something different. Not just digital noise in the darker scenes, but the whole affair just looked wrong somehow. The smooth motion of the actors looked like they had come from segments of a behind the scenes documentary, filmed on someone's smaller camcorder. Although it was a mixture of film and digital, the setups used e. A more recent example was the backlash against Peter Jackson's choice of releasing his first Hobbit movie back in at 48fps.
Many are familiar with this story of course, but despite Jackson's view of "just get over it;" audiences just couldn't move on.
Like Public Enemies , it just looked 'too' real, like reality television, instead of a fantasy to escape in. How long can the romance last with 24fps?
Believe it or not, this liaison with higher frame rates isn't going away anytime soon, with some still advocating moving on from the standard rate of dramas onto 30, 60 or even fps, in the case of James Cameron's future installments of his Avatar franchise or, at least, that's what the rumours say.
In fact, Hollywood technology wiz Douglas Trumbull claims that this particular frame rate will push us into new territory and away from the backlash that The Hobbit received. The effect will apparently look a lot more natural and less jarring than what 48fps delivered. Time will tell. If the worlds of sports broadcast or video gaming have anything to say about it, the divorce from 24p should be well on its way. You only have to open up the comments section for a new game release to see the bitter outcry of "only 30fps?!
The smoother, more realistic motion does add an extra level of realism and immersion to enjoy. Reality television, in general, does well in the bed of high frame rates, too, since it is supposed to look as real as possible. It is conceivable that, as more generations of people grow accustomed to faster frame rates for their video games, sports and TV shows, they will start to expect the same from feature films and dramas.
Is it perhaps the fault of the audience then?
0コメント